> Both Routes are interesting to me. Let's fly one February 15 and the
> other February 22! Lets get some other opinions as to which flight we do
> which week.I propose we go with your Feb 15th plan and then Vic's on the 22nd. Any seconds?
> Maybe later on we could start at Catalina!
Sounds like fun!
> I can do a nice
> table of the Lake Tahoe route similar to the one I did for Moffett. I'm
> thinking the ATIS frequency might be a good addition after the field
> elevation, although the format I modeled the table after had Magnetic
> Variation in that location. FS 2004 doesn't seem to offer Mag. Var. in
> the map view popups, and the ones on the old Sublogic maps I have is
> probably out of date.
All that's really required is magnetic course or better yet, VOR radial. Once you have either of those magnetic variation is only of academic value.
> I'm not familliar with all the tweaks involving things like fuel mixture
> and calculating the flights fuel burn to the point of having only a
> reasonable margin of safety reaching the destination.
Without cruise charts, it's too much work trying to come up with good numbers.
> Both probably keep
> my speed down a bit. I would much prefer cruising at 85 to 95 percent
> and having a bit of throttle range so I can catch up if I start to fall
> behind. Being 5 miles from the tiny dot representing anouther plane
> isn't nearly as much fun as being about half a mile away and being able
> to see the shape of the plane and it bank turning at a waypoint. Using
> the Simulator rate or CTRL-SHIFT-F feels a bit like cheating.
> CTRL-SHIFT-F tends to result in a collision to often too.
I flew the P-38 with the drop tanks last Sat and boy-o-boy, do those things create a lot of drag. I resorted to bypassing waypoints and flying direct to "keep up" with you guys!
Ben
-= VPC OffLine Reader 2.1 =-
Registered to: Ben Chiu
-OLR.PL v1.83-