Return to the VPC Lobby
FlightAdventures Virtual Pilot Center™

Need an account? Register here.

Return to AerobaticSource Lobby
Get the VPC OffLine Reader here!

"Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Multipl..."

Printer-friendly version of this topic
Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)

Previous Topic | Next Topic
VPC Forums FSFORUM
Current Message

vgbaron[Sysop]

Click to EMail vgbaron Click to send private message to vgbaron Click to view user profile


Certificates/Ratings/Crew Stations:

VPC certificates and ratings

4. "RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul..."
02-10-04, 06:14z 

> Does that estimated time enroute allow for:
>
>
> 1 Limited to 250 knots from 6268 ft to 10,000 ft after departure
>

At 250kts the P-38 can climb at 2000 fpm


> 2 Reduced speed during remainder of climb

see above

>
> 3 Not cruising at 100% throttle so other planes can catch up with the
> lead plane instead of being strung out in a line so far apart the
> trailing plane can't even see the multiplayer tag for the lead plane
>

If takeoff spacing is right - shouldn't be a problem assuming the pilot knows how to get the max out of the a/c - should easily cruise at 325kts


> At 300 kt cruise speed that might take almost a full hour, not allowing
> the additional time between different planes takeoffs and landings.
>

About same as last flight - should take about an hour with no problems


> Is tha PRB waypoint part of a published approach? If a plane is flying
> VFR would there be any reason not to fly directly to CREPE from ROM? And
> if runway 29 is the active runway at KSBP wouldn't we substitute an
> intersection ESE of KSBP for CREPE too?
>

No, PRB was snuck in there to make it easier for tb to find his way <G>. For our flights, I am not concerned with the active rwy - time dictates we use 11.


> Is it normal in the real world to include aproach waypoints in the filed
> plight plan, or to refer to the onboard plates once the controler
> assigns the flight to an destination airport runway? With the new GPS
> units in FS 2004 we now have approach procedures available during
> flight, although I'm not sure to what extent the autopilot will respond
> to a procedure selected during the flight.
>

Might be fun to setup a flight sometime with the GPS but tb would have a problem.

I've set up approaches in flight on the GPS and the AP has handled it fine.

As I said, I don't care which one we fly -

Vic


-= VPC OffLine Reader 2.1 =-
Registered to: Vic Baron
-OLR.PL v1.83-

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


Table of Contents
  Subject      Author      Message Date     ID   
  Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Multipl...    RobertVA      02-08-04       
     RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   vgbaron[Sysop]      02-08-04      1   
        RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   RobertVA[Lead]      02-09-04      3   
             RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...    vgbaron[Sysop]      02-10-04      4   
                  RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   RobertVA[Lead]      02-10-04      5   
                       RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   Ben_Chiu[Admin]      02-10-04      6   
                       RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   vgbaron[Sysop]      02-11-04      7   
                            RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   tb[Lead]      02-11-04      8   
                                 RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   RobertVA[Lead]      02-13-04      17   
                       RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   PL965Melo[Crew]      02-12-04      9   
                            RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   RobertVA[Lead]      02-12-04      10   
                                 RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   Ben_Chiu[Admin]      02-12-04      11   
                                      RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   Ben_Chiu[Admin]      02-12-04      12   
                                           RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   PL965Melo[Crew]      02-13-04      15   
                                                RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   Ben_Chiu[Admin]      02-13-04      18   
                                                     RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   PL965Melo[Crew]      02-15-04      22   
                                                          RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   Ben_Chiu[Admin]      02-15-04      24   
                                                               RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   PL965Melo[Crew]      02-19-04      26   
                                                                    RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   Ben_Chiu[Admin]      02-20-04      28   
                                           RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   RobertVA[Lead]      02-13-04      16   
                                                RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   Ben_Chiu[Admin]      02-13-04      19   
                                 RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   PL965Melo[Crew]      02-13-04      14   
                                      RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   Ben_Chiu[Admin]      02-13-04      20   
                                           RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   PL965Melo[Crew]      02-15-04      23   
                                                RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   Ben_Chiu[Admin]      02-15-04      25   
                                                     RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   PL965Melo[Crew]      02-19-04      27   
     RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   andor[Lead]      02-09-04      2   
     RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   tb[Lead]      02-13-04      13   
     RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   andor[Lead]      02-14-04      21   
        RE: Proposed Route Feb 15 0300z Mul...   DylanK[Crew]      02-24-04      29   

Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

 


Terms of Use

There are currently
Copyright © 2000- FlightAdventures. All rights reserved.

Powered by DCForum