Greetings again, Dave:> I'd have to actually lay it out but my gut level is that the fuselage
> doesn't really give the rudder much help (as far as its pitch moment) to
> the plane. The force the rudder puts on the fuselage is more a drag to
> the rear than a straight down force on the fuselage (its pulling
> backward on the rudder, not pushing straight down). Technically this
> puts a downward force but very little.
Well, I would think that since rudders are usually comparable in size to elevators and usually located in the same distance from the CG, it would be at least 1/2 or more as effective as the elevator.
> It would be interesting to see how you friend flies the Luscombe (does
> he move his foot from one rudder to the other??)
You know, it's been a while since I asked him about that (I've never flown with him) so I don't recall him saying exactly how he did it, but I do remember that he flew an unmodified Luscombe, so he must have been doing the rudder dance in double-time. I also remember that he had to do a demonstration of capability with an FAA inspector inspector (he passed on the third or fourth attempt). I don't know, I think it's wonderful that Jonathan was able to him a lot of credit for making it work, but I know folks that have problems flying with two feet and can only imagine what goes on in his cockpit when there's a gusty crosswind!
> In the air, move the
> stick to the left (or right) without any coordinating rudder and it
> really doesn't turn, just kinda skids along. In fact, you can use the
> rudder to bank into the turn and only use some back pressure on the
> stick (no aileron) and make some very nice turns. If you drop a wing in
> a stall you basically have to pick it up with rudder.
I guess that illustrations how effective the rudder really is. In fact I remember when that Airbus lost it's tail in NY, the FAA was quick to clarify that Va (maneuvering speed) does not include full rudder deflection!!
Ben
-= VPC OffLine Reader 2.1 =-
Registered to: Ben Chiu
-OLR.PL v1.80-