Return to the VPC Lobby
FlightAdventures Virtual Pilot Center™

Need an account? Register here.

Return to AerobaticSource Lobby
Get the VPC OffLine Reader here!

"KCLT to KAVL"

Printer-friendly version of this topic
Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)
 
Previous Topic | Next Topic  
VPC Forums VPC Tech
Original message

andor[Lead]

Click to EMail andor Click to send private message to andor Click to view user profile


Certificates/Ratings/Crew Stations:

VPC certificates and ratings

"KCLT to KAVL"
04-02-04, 23:36z 

VFR Flight from Charlotte Douglas Intnl to Ashville Regnl.


KCLT twds. KAVL

Aircraft: Mooney Bravo


WaypointName Type Frequency HeadingAltitudeDistance Est. SpeedETE

KCLT

Charlotte Douglas Intnl

Departure Airport

112.4188250013.5 nm.100 KIAS0:8:6

FML

Fort Mill

VOR/DME

112.4

278

2500

47.8

150 KIAS0:19:7

SPA

Spartanburg

VOR/DME

115.7

328

4500

27.9

150 KIAS0:11:9

SUG

Sugarloaf

VOR/DME

112.2

235

6500

12.7

150 KIAS0:5:4

BRA

Broad River

NDB

379.0

344

4500

9.8

100 KIAS0:5:52

KAVL

Ashville Regnl.

Destination

110.5 ILS

34/16

2165

0

1 KIAS0:0:0

WPT

0

1 KIAS0:0:0

KAVL

Total Distance: 111.69999999999999 nm. Total Time: 0:48:78

Generated by the FlightAdventures Flight Plan Table Generator Beta v1.1

Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


  Table of Contents

  Subject      Author      Message Date     ID   
  RE: KCLT to KAVL andor[Lead] 04-02-04 1
   RE: KCLT to KAVL andor[Lead] 04-03-04 2
        RE: KCLT to KAVL Ben_Chiu[Admin] 04-03-04 4
   RE: KCLT to KAVL Ben_Chiu[Admin] 04-03-04 3
   RE: KCLT to KAVL Ben_Chiu[Admin] 04-04-04 5
        RE: KCLT to KAVL andor[Lead] 04-05-04 6
             RE: KCLT to KAVL Ben_Chiu[Admin] 04-05-04 7
        RE: KCLT to KAVL RobertVA[Lead] 04-05-04 8
             RE: KCLT to KAVL Ben_Chiu[Admin] 04-06-04 9
                  RE: KCLT to KAVL RobertVA[Lead] 04-06-04 10
                       RE: KCLT to KAVL Ben_Chiu[Admin] 04-06-04 11
                            RE: KCLT to KAVL RobertVA[Lead] 04-06-04 12
                                 RE: KCLT to KAVL Ben_Chiu[Admin] 04-12-04 13
                                      RE: KCLT to KAVL andor[Lead] 04-13-04 14
                                           RE: KCLT to KAVL Ben_Chiu[Admin] 04-15-04 15

Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Messages in this topic

andor[Lead]

Click to EMail andor Click to send private message to andor Click to view user profile


Certificates/Ratings/Crew Stations:

VPC certificates and ratings

1. "RE: KCLT to KAVL"
04-02-04, 23:56z 

G,day Ben, Vic,
This looks better, I have sorted out the Route and Leg input fields.. simple when you are told how :)
I think I have solved the multiple flight plans I was getting.
Prior to making up, copying & pasting the Plan into the Message box, I was entering a few lines of comments, like A/P frequencies, runways etc.
Is it a coincidence in that the number of copies of the plan equalled the number of lines in my comments !! ??
I will try and paste this Plan (only)into the Forum for Saturday if OK by everyone.
Will keep at it , thanks again to all who set it up.
Regards,
Andy

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


andor[Lead]

Click to EMail andor Click to send private message to andor Click to view user profile


Certificates/Ratings/Crew Stations:

VPC certificates and ratings

2. "RE: KCLT to KAVL"
04-03-04, 00:09z 

G,day Ben Vic,

Have just tried to post into the message board and sadly, back to it,s old tricks, 17 copies of the Flight Plan appeared listed in the Message :(
I did not post it, it pasted across OK except for the number of copies. ??
Again will keep at it & refuse to loose my sense of humour. Please don,t tell tb about this :)
Regards,
Andy

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


Ben_Chiu[Admin]

Click to EMail Ben_Chiu Click to send private message to Ben_Chiu Click to view user profile


Certificates/Ratings/Crew Stations:

VPC certificates and ratings

4. "RE: KCLT to KAVL"
04-03-04, 02:14z 

>Have just tried to post into the message board and sadly,
>back to it,s old tricks, 17 copies of the Flight Plan
>appeared listed in the Message :(

That's very odd, Andy. Did you do anything differently than when you posted the lead message in this thread?


>I did not post it, it pasted across OK except for the
>number of copies. ??

Have you tried using right click, then selecting paste instead? Also, what happens if you paste into a word document. How many times do you see "Flight Plan Table Generator Beta v1.1"?

How many times do you see that phrase in the FPTG Copy to clipboard window? I'm trying to determine where the multiple copies are coming from (your clipboard, the FPTG, or user). :)


>Again will keep at it & refuse to loose my sense of
>humour. Please don,t tell tb about this :)

Mums the word. :)

Ben

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


Ben_Chiu[Admin]

Click to EMail Ben_Chiu Click to send private message to Ben_Chiu Click to view user profile


Certificates/Ratings/Crew Stations:

VPC certificates and ratings

3. "RE: KCLT to KAVL"
04-03-04, 02:10z 

G,day Andy:

>This looks better

Looks great to me! :)


>I have sorted out the Route and Leg
>input fields.. simple when you are told how :)

LOL!


>I think I have solved the multiple flight plans I was
>getting.
>Prior to making up, copying & pasting the Plan into the
>Message box, I was entering a few lines of comments, like
>A/P frequencies, runways etc.
>Is it a coincidence in that the number of copies of the
>plan equalled the number of lines in my comments !! ??

Hmm, don't know. Never tried that. The comment line only supports a limited number of characters (which we can change, but didn't think folks would add so many). I'll give it a try and see what happens.


>I will try and paste this Plan (only)into the Forum for
>Saturday if OK by everyone.

So this isn't where you propose we fly on Sat? tb will be disappointed. :)


>Will keep at it , thanks again to all who set it up.

We'll get it working the way you want... eventually. :)


Ben

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


Ben_Chiu[Admin]

Click to EMail Ben_Chiu Click to send private message to Ben_Chiu Click to view user profile


Certificates/Ratings/Crew Stations:

VPC certificates and ratings

5. "RE: KCLT to KAVL"
04-04-04, 20:56z 

G,day Andy:

> This looks better, I have sorted out the Route and Leg input fields..
> simple when you are told how :)

I had another look at the layout of the FPTG and noticed that the current format is a bit confusing. What we've done is renamed the legs so they are correct/make sense (e.g. Leg 1 is now the leg from departure to WP1, Leg 2 is from WP1 to WP2 etc.). We've also added a small help tips link in the Route section. We'll probably add more help boxes if we run into more confusion.

Beta version 1.11 is now up and ready for use.

Best!

Ben


-= VPC OffLine Reader 2.1 =-
Registered to: Ben Chiu
-OLR.PL v1.83-

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


andor[Lead]

Click to EMail andor Click to send private message to andor Click to view user profile


Certificates/Ratings/Crew Stations:

VPC certificates and ratings

6. "RE: KCLT to KAVL"
04-05-04, 06:08z 

G,day Ben,
The V1 was OK once used to it. My last effort posted almost correctly :)
I will give the V 1.11 a good work out , don,t worry about that :) but the plans will only be for practice , I don,t want the crew to think I am hogging the planning arena :)
Again thanks Ben,
Will post to the Tech some exotic flight :)
Regards,
Andy

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


Ben_Chiu[Admin]

Click to EMail Ben_Chiu Click to send private message to Ben_Chiu Click to view user profile


Certificates/Ratings/Crew Stations:

VPC certificates and ratings

7. "RE: KCLT to KAVL"
04-05-04, 20:46z 

G,day Andy:

>The V1 was OK once used to it. My last effort posted
>almost correctly :)
>I will give the V 1.11 a good work out , don,t worry about
>that :) but the plans will only be for practice , I don,t
>want the crew to think I am hogging the planning arena :)

No worries, Andy. Post as many as you can stand. I'm sure many of us will find them useful and I'm sure we'll eventually fly them all.


>Again thanks Ben,
>Will post to the Tech some exotic flight :)

Looking forward to seeing and flying it!


Ben

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


RobertVA[Lead]

Click to EMail RobertVA Click to send private message to RobertVA Click to view user profile


Certificates/Ratings/Crew Stations:

VPC certificates and ratings

8. "RE: KCLT to KAVL"
04-05-04, 21:47z 

On the subject of flight plan legs:

Just what is the real world convention for heading, speed and distance position in a plan? Should this information appear on the line with the the waypoint at the beginning of the leg, or on the line with the waypoint at the end of the leg? It could get pretty confuseing if we don't follow some standard, prefferably that used in the real world.

Is speed normally listed as ground speed or indicated airspeed. Allowance for winds and altitude could really complicate time enroute calculations based on indicated airspeed.

Do plans normally have seperate sections for departure and destination airport information?

Does the US FAA have a standard form for fileing a flight plan, and are the forms in other nations arrainged the same way?

Robert

Near KORF

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


Ben_Chiu[Admin]

Click to EMail Ben_Chiu Click to send private message to Ben_Chiu Click to view user profile


Certificates/Ratings/Crew Stations:

VPC certificates and ratings

9. "RE: KCLT to KAVL"
04-06-04, 03:11z 

> On the subject of flight plan legs:
>
> Just what is the real world convention for heading, speed and distance
> position in a plan? Should this information appear on the line with the
> the waypoint at the beginning of the leg, or on the line with the
> waypoint at the end of the leg?

I'm not sure what you're asking. Leg info should be on the same line as what is required to get from the previous WP to the next WP.


> It could get pretty confuseing if we
> don't follow some standard, prefferably that used in the real world.

Unfortunately, there really isn't a standard layout. However, the information remains the same.


> Is speed normally listed as ground speed or indicated airspeed.

It's usually groundspeed, but unless you know the winds, you go with TAS, but without cruise charts you're left with IAS, and at the low altitudes and short distances we fly, IAS is close enough.


> Allowance for winds and altitude could really complicate time enroute
> calculations based on indicated airspeed.

Yep. See above.


> Do plans normally have seperate sections for departure and destination
> airport information?

Not usually, but the flight plan forms I give to my students has some space for the immediately important stuff (freqs, runways, elevation, etc.). The rest of the airport info can be looked up in the AFD when you're on the ground.


> Does the US FAA have a standard form for fileing a flight plan, and are
> the forms in other nations arrainged the same way?

Yes, the FAA has a standard form for filing. I think we have one online somewhere around here. I know it's on the back of the FlightAdventures Flight Plan form (a pdf I uploaded many moons ago). I have no idea what other countries use, but I suspect they're similar as again, while the format may be different, the required info remains the same.

Hope this helps!

Ben


-= VPC OffLine Reader 2.1 =-
Registered to: Ben Chiu
-OLR.PL v1.83-

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


RobertVA[Lead]

Click to EMail RobertVA Click to send private message to RobertVA Click to view user profile


Certificates/Ratings/Crew Stations:

VPC certificates and ratings

10. "RE: KCLT to KAVL"
04-06-04, 05:03z 

Say waypoint 1 is 30 nm North of the departure airport.

Waypoint 2 is 50 nm East of waypoint 1.

The Navigation Log in Flight Simulator would display (and print) no frequency, heading, distance (along leg), speed or time enroute (for leg) on the line with the departure airport. It would display heading, distance, speed, and ETE for the firat leg on the line with the ID for waypoint 1. Heading, distance, speed and ETE information for the leg between Waypoint 1 and Waypoint 2 would appear on the line with Waypoint 2. Speed is displayed as ground speed. Thus(lines showing TOTAL remaining distance and time Enroute omited):


DEP APT
WPT1 VOR xxx.5x 5,000 360 030 90 0:20
WPT2 VOR xxx.7x 5,000 090 050 90 0:33
DST APT 1,200 180 060 90 0:40

This is also consistant with the BAO Flight Shop planner that predates the Microsoft planner.

But for the same route some plans from other sources would show:


DEP APT xxx.5x x,xxx 360 030 90 0:20
WPT1 VOR xxx.5x x,xxx 090 050 90 0:33
WPT2 VOR xxx.7x x,xxx 180 060 90 0:40
DST APT xxx.xx 1,200 5/23 0 0 0:00

Switching back and forth it gets a bit frustrating figuring out which system is in use. Since everybody has the default planner can we be consistant with it and set up the table generator that way? Pilots with other planners could import their plans into the simulator and type their plans up from that display or its hard copy.

To calculate ETE you have to go through (estimated) groundspeed anyway. You wouldn't even be able to calculate time enroute from IAS or true airspeed without wind information anyway, and the first "E" does stand for "Estimated". With estimated groundspeed you at least know what the ETE was calculated from.

Robert

Near KORF

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


Ben_Chiu[Admin]

Click to EMail Ben_Chiu Click to send private message to Ben_Chiu Click to view user profile


Certificates/Ratings/Crew Stations:

VPC certificates and ratings

11. "RE: KCLT to KAVL"
04-06-04, 06:40z 

Greetings Robert:

> Say waypoint 1 is 30 nm North of the departure airport.
>
> Waypoint 2 is 50 nm East of waypoint 1.
>
> The Navigation Log in Flight Simulator would display (and print) no
> frequency, heading, distance (along leg), speed or time enroute (for
> leg) on the line with the departure airport. It would display heading,
> distance, speed, and ETE for the firat leg on the line with the ID for
> waypoint 1. Heading, distance, speed and ETE information for the leg
> between Waypoint 1 and Waypoint 2 would appear on the line with Waypoint
> 2. Speed is displayed as ground speed. Thus(lines showing TOTAL
> remaining distance and time Enroute omited):
>
>
> DEP APT
> WPT1 VOR xxx.5x 5,000 360 030 90 0:20
> WPT2 VOR xxx.7x 5,000 090 050 90 0:33
> DST APT 1,200 180 060 90 0:40
>
>
> This is also consistant with the BAO Flight Shop planner that predates
> the Microsoft planner.
>
> But for the same route some plans from other sources would show:
>
>
> DEP APT xxx.5x x,xxx 360 030 90 0:20
> WPT1 VOR xxx.5x x,xxx 090 050 90 0:33
> WPT2 VOR xxx.7x x,xxx 180 060 90 0:40
> DST APT xxx.xx 1,200 5/23 0 0 0:00

Thanks for taking the time to fill in the details. I understand what you're getting at. I can tell you that the latter is what I use and most flight plans in the real world will show. The reason is many departures (and all IFR departures) require at least a heading from the departure airport (and some NAVAID is more common). So unless WP1 on the former flight plan is the departure airport, well, you'd be in trouble. Even on an VFR flight plan, there should be some sort of navigation (even if heading and altitude) to WP1.


> Switching back and forth it gets a bit frustrating figuring out which
> system is in use. Since everybody has the default planner can we be
> consistant with it and set up the table generator that way? Pilots with
> other planners could import their plans into the simulator and type
> their plans up from that display or its hard copy.

I'd propose that we didn't adopt the MSFP and use the real world planners (or charts) because the MS format is not what you'll see in the real world. I think that although many of the guys have no intentions of seriously flying for real anytime soon, I don't think that learning to use the right tools can be bad for you.


> To calculate ETE you have to go through (estimated) groundspeed anyway.
> You wouldn't even be able to calculate time enroute from IAS or true
> airspeed without wind information anyway, and the first "E" does stand
> for "Estimated". With estimated groundspeed you at least know what the
> ETE was calculated from.

We run into this in the real world. No one knows winds aloft (even then, they're just forecasts) until close to flight time. So we use the next best thing for preliminary flight planning--TAS numbers from cruise charts. As I stated in my previous message, at the altitudes, speeds and distances we fly at, IAS is pretty darn close to what TAS is (not enough to make a big difference in time and fuel--in the neighborhood of 3-6 minutes or miles at most) and perfectly acceptable.

In the end, all that matters is that you don't run out of fuel before you reach your destination, and that you land within 1/2 hour of when your filed flight plan says you will arrive. So unless you're stretching fuel to the last drop (even then, real flight requires you have 1/2 hour reserve and 45 min reserve at night at cruise), calculating exact minutes or exact fuel left in your tanks when you land isn't really necessary.

Anyway, for those wanting to take the calculations that far, we have POH's for most GA aircraft here, so we can look up TAS's for a given altitude and temperature and provide that for your flight plans. But again, unless you know winds aloft at the time of the flight, you'll have a less accurate ETE and fuel burn.

Ben


-= VPC OffLine Reader 2.1 =-
Registered to: Ben Chiu
-OLR.PL v1.83-

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


RobertVA[Lead]

Click to EMail RobertVA Click to send private message to RobertVA Click to view user profile


Certificates/Ratings/Crew Stations:

VPC certificates and ratings

12. "RE: KCLT to KAVL"
04-06-04, 20:45z 

I'm OK with either. The switching back & forth is what makes it frustrating.

Apparently the intention in the BAO and MS planners was to show the mileage and heading to the waypoint on the line with the waypoint. Thus pilots planning to use a published departure could include the departure's waypoints in the plan. Thus the heading TO the first waypoint would appear on the line with the first waypoint.

For the multiplayer flights I posted plans for, I modeled the layout on an example in an old BAO Flight Shop manual (FS 5 vintage). The planner in that product (a Windows 3.1 application) produced a hardcopy printout in fixxed pitch font to look like something a typewriter could produce. It looked like it was intended to be a typed mockup of a government form.

Robert

Near KORF

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


Ben_Chiu[Admin]

Click to EMail Ben_Chiu Click to send private message to Ben_Chiu Click to view user profile


Certificates/Ratings/Crew Stations:

VPC certificates and ratings

13. "RE: KCLT to KAVL"
04-12-04, 18:15z 

Greetings Robert:

I located our Flight Plan (back) sheet which has an FAA Flight Plan form on it. I've posted the link to download it in the Crew Forum. I think you'll see the format is quite different. When folks use the term "flight plan" there are several connotations. One is a navigation log (what the FPTG creates). The other is a collection of information that is filed with ATC to let them know what your intentions/"plan" are/is.

One thought that I've been kicking around is taking the data from the FPTG and also plugging it into an FAA Flight Plan format. The data could then be fed to the PWF ATC function. This way PWF ATC will have your flight plan when you fly and will be able to help you get where you want to go. But as you can imagine, it can get quite complex working out the details, but I think it can be done. The question is will anyone use it/will it be worth our effort to make it a reality?

Ben


-= VPC OffLine Reader 2.1 =-
Registered to: Ben Chiu
-OLR.PL v1.83-

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


andor[Lead]

Click to EMail andor Click to send private message to andor Click to view user profile


Certificates/Ratings/Crew Stations:

VPC certificates and ratings

14. "RE: KCLT to KAVL"
04-13-04, 23:58z 

G,day Ben, Robert,
Iv,e been reading all your discussion re the FPTG with great interest, and appreciate the work being applied.

For my ten cents worth :) I tend to go along with your very last comments Ben and indeed will anyone use it and the effort you guys are putting into it. I think keeping the format simple and straightforward will perhaps encourage (us) to use it, if only to know where to go to when joining multiplay and the destination for anyone late in joining or dropping out etc. or to join in anywhere along the track.

Regards,
Andy

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


Ben_Chiu[Admin]

Click to EMail Ben_Chiu Click to send private message to Ben_Chiu Click to view user profile


Certificates/Ratings/Crew Stations:

VPC certificates and ratings

15. "RE: KCLT to KAVL"
04-15-04, 02:41z 

Greetings Andy:

> For my ten cents worth :) I tend to go along with your very last
> comments Ben and indeed will anyone use it and the effort you guys are
> putting into it. I think keeping the format simple and straightforward
> will perhaps encourage (us) to use it, if only to know where to go to
> when joining multiplay and the destination for anyone late in joining or
> dropping out etc. or to join in anywhere along the track.

Thinking about it some more, I think perhaps the features proposed may be a bit advanced at this point (requires more aeronautical knowledge and piloting skills), and therefore won't be of much interest to the majority of folks here. When more pilots are able to complete flights on their own from flight planning to touchdown, I think they'll begin to find use for the proposed feature additions.

Ben


-= VPC OffLine Reader 2.1 =-
Registered to: Ben Chiu
-OLR.PL v1.83-

Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top



Lock | Archive | Remove

Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

 


Terms of Use

There are currently
Copyright © 2000- FlightAdventures. All rights reserved.

Powered by DCForum